Skip to main content

What the Bitcoin Halving Means

A few days ago, a pretty major event in the world of bitcoin occurred known as the "halving." If you haven't read any significant literature about bitcoin, you may not have a clue what this means or why you should care. If you're not into bitcoin, or cryptocurrency generally, you may not have a reason to care. But if you're the slightest bit interested in what the halving means, read on (it's pretty painless, I promise).

Unlike U.S. currency, which is physically made in the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing or the U.S. Mint, bitcoin is mined. What this means is that bitcoin comes into digital existence when a person earns it by mining. Mining is essentially the process of solving complex problems that serve to verify blocks of transactions on the bitcoin blockchain (you still following?). So when a person, known as a miner, successfully solves the problem that serves to verify a block of transactions, that person receives a reward in the form of bitcoin. Prior to Monday, May 11 at approximately 3:23 pm est, miners received 12.5 bitcoin for solving those problems. And then the halving occurred. Going forward, miners will only receive half of that amount--6.25 bitcoin. So that's the significance of "the halving"--less bitcoin for performing the work needed to verify transactions.

The halving is part of the network's protocol and will happen again and again at predetermined intervals. Bitcoin was designed to eventually have a total circulation of 21 million bitcoin so eventually there will come a point when there are no more bitcoin to be mined.

While mining is significantly less lucrative than it was at the start of the week, it's still pretty lucrative for those with the computing power to perform it (bitcoin is trading at just under $9k USD right now).

Wanna chat more about the bitcoin halving? Email me at info@blockchainblawg.com or tweet me @blockchainblawg.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Rundown on CBDCs

Everyday there is a news report about a country that is "exploring" or "studying" the possibility of developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In the past few days, I've read articles about Rwanda, Israel and France looking to pilot programs with CBDCs. And yesterday, the Bank of International Settlements announced its backing of the development of CBDCs. With approximately 80% of central banks around the world taking a closer look at CBDCs, now is as good a time as any to learn more about them. What Are They? A central bank digital currency is exactly what it sounds like--a digital currency issued by a central bank. In the same way our central bank, the Federal Reserve, issues the U.S. dollar, it would similarly issue some official U.S. digital currency ('digital dollar'). This is pretty much where the simplicity of it all ends. Things get really hairy (really fast) when central banks have to figure out how CBDCs fit into a traditional financ

Before You Mint Your NFT

With NFT season taking a bit of a breather (kinda), I thought this would be the perfect time to lay out a few things to consider before minting an NFT.  If you missed the frenzy, well, welcome. "NFT" stands for non-fungible token and these digital tokens represent real world ownership and provenance of a particular asset. NFTs are minted (i.e., produced), stored and transacted (bought/sold/traded) on a distributed ledger like blockchain. Some NFTs represent ownership of tangible assets and some NFTs are digital/virtual assets  (yes, a digital piece of art was purchased for $69M). "Non-fungibility" is a scary word but it essentially means that the asset is unique, cannot be interchanged with another asset, and cannot be replicated. Think of NFTs as either collectibles, like artwork and trading cards, or title to tangible/real property, like real estate and cars.  So with all the excitement having simmered down a bit, below are a few things to think about before you

A Changing Tide. But Not Really.

I almost titled this post, "An Open Love Letter to Rep. Darren Soto" but I thought that might be weird. I landed on [whatever it is] because it has recently occurred to me that there may be significant legislation around blockchain coming out of Congress this session. Rep. Soto (FL-09) has been one of blockchain's biggest champions on Capitol Hill and I expect that will continue to be the case. In anticipation of "big things blockin," I thought I'd revisit two blockchain bills that made it out of the House of Representatives during the last congressional session. Given the change in the make-up of the Senate, maybe we'll see them again. But maybe we won't need to see them again....? Stay tuned. The first of the two bills was the Blockchain Innovation Act. This legislation sought to have the Department of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission study the use of blockchain technology in commerce and assess its fraud and security risks and benefits. This