Skip to main content

I (OC)C You!

I recently took a course on banking law and am convinced that big banks are evil. But that's not what's important here. What is important here is that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, one of the primary federal regulators of national banks, has recently published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in anticipation of its plans to review its regulations on digital banking activities.

The ANRP essentially invites input from the public (read: banking and tech firms) on how the OCC should consider current technological advancements in the regulatory framework. Lots of technologies get a "shout out" in the notice--clouding computing, artificial intelligence, biometrics, data analytics and our beloved distributed ledger and technology. Along with the "shout outs," the notice touches on the benefits of all this new technology (new products, more efficiency, further reach) and the inherent challenges (cybersecurity risks, increased competition from non-banks, changing customer needs). Ultimately, the OCC is contemplating whether some of these new activities (borne out of new technologies) are unnecessarily burdened by the existing regulatory framework as well as how these activities "promote economic growth and opportunity and ensure that banks operate in a safe and sound manner, provide fair access to financial services, [and] treat customers fairly."

It'll be interesting to see how the regulations change, if they change at all. On the one hand, the current regulatory framework seems to allow banks plenty of flexibility to deploy new technologies--both in terms of infrastructure and products. But big banks and other systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) (a.k.a., "too big to fail") exert enormous influence on lawmaking when it comes to the realm of finance. If there are other avenues the big banks wish to pursue that are somehow made prohibitively burdensome by the current regulations, I have little doubt that they'll get the changes they want. I also suspect that if less big banks are innovating in ways that are threatening to big banks, the laws will take care of that, too.

Do you think the big banks will get their way? (This is obviously a trick question) If you want to see the banks throw their weight around, I strongly recommend the HBO film Too Big to Fail. It's a fantastic and maddening depiction of the 2008 financial crisis and the Treasury Secretary's fight to keep the financial system afloat.


Popular posts from this blog

The Rundown on CBDCs

Everyday there is a news report about a country that is "exploring" or "studying" the possibility of developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In the past few days, I've read articles about Rwanda, Israel and France looking to pilot programs with CBDCs. And yesterday, the Bank of International Settlements announced its backing of the development of CBDCs. With approximately 80% of central banks around the world taking a closer look at CBDCs, now is as good a time as any to learn more about them. What Are They? A central bank digital currency is exactly what it sounds like--a digital currency issued by a central bank. In the same way our central bank, the Federal Reserve, issues the U.S. dollar, it would similarly issue some official U.S. digital currency ('digital dollar'). This is pretty much where the simplicity of it all ends. Things get really hairy (really fast) when central banks have to figure out how CBDCs fit into a traditional financ

ABCs of DeF(i)

The summer of 2020 is notable for a host of reasons. A pandemic. #BLM protests. USPS shenanigans. But within the blockchain/crypto space, the summer of 2020 will be remembered as "DeFi Summer." Short for "decentralized finance," DeFi refers to a system of automated financial arrangements stored and executed on a distributed ledger such as blockchain. One of my business faves, Mark Cuban, recently touted the potential for DeFi to explode in the next 10 years. I may be biased but I agree; DeFi has the potential to revolutionize finance. Automation is Key We know that blockchain can facilitate peer-to-peer transactions in a trustless environment, that transactions happen without the need for a third party intermediary, and that an immutable record of the transaction is stored on the ledger. In other words, transactions happen automatically and records of transactions are incapable of being changed. This is why bitcoin was created. This is blockchain 1.0. We also know

Happy New Year! + OCC OKs Stablecoins

Happy New Year from the most consistently inconsistent blogger to ever have blogged! I've finally accepted myself for who and what I am in hope that I'll surprise myself by becoming inconsistently consistent. I'm trying to make 2021 "The year of execution" so *fingers crossed* we shall see. On to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)... Yesterday, the OCC announced (well, clarified) that banks are able to use distributed ledger technology (e.g., blockchain) to verify and store transactions and they are also able to transact stablecoins. Banks must continue to comply with the applicable laws and other sound banking practices, such as "Know Your Customer," anti-money laundering controls, and Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. However, the OCC recognizes the efficiency and security benefits associated with blockchain technology in banking. The regulator also recognizes the banking industry's track record of competently (mostly) de